Sleep-dependent engram reactivation during hippocampal memory consolidation associated with subregion-specific biosynthetic changes

1. Article Information

  • Title : Sleep-dependent engram reactivation during hippocampal memory consolidation associated with subregion-specific biosynthetic changes
  • Corresponding author : [[ Sara J. Anton ]]
  • Keyword : #Hippocampus, #DentateGyrus, #Engram, #SleepDeprivation (SD), #GeoMx, #Sleep

2. TL;DR ๐Ÿ˜ดโžก๏ธ๐Ÿงฌ

Post-learning sleep์€ DG inferior blade์˜ engram ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋ฅผ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•ด ๊ธฐ์–ต ๊ณต๊ณ ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋•๊ณ , Sleep depriviation์€ inferior blade์—์„œ์˜ neural activity์™€ **actin cytoskeleton**ยท**ribosomal biogenesis** ๊ด€๋ จ ์ „์‚ฌ ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์„ ํƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ต์ œํ•ด Contextual fear memory (CFM)์„ ์†์ƒ์‹œํ‚จ๋‹ค.


3. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฐ๊ฒฝ ๋ฐ ๋ชฉ์ 

  • Hippocampus-dependent memory๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ์งํ›„์˜ ์˜คํ”„๋ผ์ธ ์žฌ์ƒ(reactivation)์— ์˜ํ•ด ๊ณต๊ณ ํ™”๋œ๋‹ค๋Š” ๊ฐ€์„ค์ด ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•˜๋‹ค.
  • ํŠนํžˆ DG๋Š” neocortexโ†’entorhinalโ†’DG๋กœ ์ด์–ด์ง€๋Š” ์ž…๋ ฅ ๊ด€๋ฌธ์ด๋ฉฐ engram ์กฐ์ž‘๋งŒ์œผ๋กœ๋„ CFM recall์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค.
  • ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” CFC ์ดํ›„ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด vs. SD ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ DG (superior vs. inferior) engram ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™”์™€ ์ด์— ์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๋˜๋Š” subregion-specific ์ „์‚ฌยท๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๊ทœ๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ๋ชฉํ‘œ๋กœ ํ–ˆ๋‹ค.

4. ์ฃผ์š” ๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ (ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ) โญ๏ธ

  1. Subregion-specific engram ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™”: CFC ํ›„ 6h ๋™์•ˆ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ์‹œ **inferior blade** engram์ด ์„ ํ˜ธ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋˜๊ณ , SD์—์„œ๋Š” ์ด ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๊ฐ€ ์†Œ์‹ค๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด ๋งฅ๋ฝ ์žฌ๋…ธ์ถœ(waking)์€ ์ฃผ๋กœ superior blade๋ฅผ ํ™œ์„ฑํ™”ํ•œ๋‹ค. (Fig. 2, p.5)
  2. Inferior blade ์„ ํƒ์  ํ™œ๋™ ์–ต์ œ: SD๋Š” DG inferior blade์˜ cFos/Arc+ ์„ธํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐ์†Œ์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ๋ฐ˜๋ฉด, CA1/CA3 ๋ฐ hilus์—์„œ๋Š” IEG ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€ ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. (Fig. 3, p.6โ€“7)
  3. Subregion-specific transcriptome: GeoMx-WTA์—์„œ SD๊ฐ€ ์œ ๋„ํ•˜๋Š” DEGs๊ฐ€ DG blades, CA1, CA3์—์„œ ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ƒ์ด. ํŠนํžˆ inferior blade์—์„œ **activity-driven transcripts** ๋ฐ **actin cytoskeleton** ๊ด€๋ จ ์œ ์ „์ž๋“ค์ด ์„ ํƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ต์ œ๋œ๋‹ค. (Fig. 4โ€“6, p.8โ€“13)
  4. ํ•™์Šต ํšจ๊ณผ์˜ DG ์ œํ•œ์„ฑ: CFC 6h ํ›„ ์ „์‚ฌ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” DG์—๋งŒ ๊ฒ€์ถœ๋˜๋ฉฐ(ํŠนํžˆ superior blade์—์„œ 784 DEGs), CA1/CA3/hilus์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ ์˜๋ฏธํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๊ฐ€ ์—†๋‹ค. (Fig. 7, p.14โ€“15)
  5. ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ/์ธ์‚ฐํ™” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์ฐจ๋“ฑ์„ฑ: SD๋Š” CA1/CA3/hilus์—์„œ pS6, pERK1/2๋ฅผ ์ฆ๊ฐ€์‹œํ‚ค๋ฉฐ, blade ๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ-์ „์‚ฌ์ฒด ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถˆ์ผ์น˜ํ•œ๋‹ค(๋ฒˆ์—ญยท์ˆ˜์†ก ์†๋„ ์ฐจ์ด ์‹œ์‚ฌ). (Fig. 8, p.16โ€“17)

5. Methods ๐Ÿ”ฌ

  • Engram ๋ผ๋ฒจ๋ง: cfos-CREER ร— tdTomato (TRAP) ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ + 4-OHT.
  • ํ–‰๋™: Single-trial CFC (Context A, 0.75 mA shock), ์ดํ›„ 6h ad lib sleep ๋˜๋Š” gentle handling ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ SD. CFM์€ freezing% ๋ณ€ํ™”๋กœ ์ •๋Ÿ‰.
  • IHC: cFos/Arc
  • Spatial transcriptomics (GeoMx DSP, WTA): DG superior/inferior blade, hilus, CA1, CA3 ROI ์ •์˜ ํ›„ 20k ์œ ์ „์ž ํ”„๋กœํŒŒ์ผ๋ง; LMM, FDR<0.1.
  • Protein/phosphoprotein DSP: MAPK/PI3K/AKT ๋“ฑ ํŒจ๋„ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ์ •๋Ÿ‰.
  • Pathway ๋ถ„์„: GO/KEGG, upstream regulator ์˜ˆ์ธก.

6. Figure๋ณ„ ์š”์•ฝ (Results ํ•˜์œ„์†Œ์ œ๋ชฉ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜) ๐Ÿ–ผ๏ธ

Figure 1 (p.4): ๋งฅ๋ฝ ์žฌ๋…ธ์ถœยทCFC์—์„œ์˜ engram ํŠน์ด์„ฑ

  • TRAP-labeled DG granule cell์ด ๋™์ผ ๋งฅ๋ฝ์—์„œ ๋” ์ž˜ ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™”. ํŠนํžˆ superior blade์—์„œ Aโ†’A ์กฐ๊ฑด์˜ cFos/tdTomato overlap ์ฆ๊ฐ€.

Figure 2 (p.5): ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ์˜์กด์  engram ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™”

  • CFC ํ›„ ์ˆ˜๋ฉด ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ DG inferior blade engram ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™”โ†‘, SD์—์„œ ์†Œ์‹ค. CFM freezing๋„ SD์—์„œ ๊ฐ์†Œ.

    Figure 3 (p.6โ€“7): SD๊ฐ€ ํ•˜์œ„์—ฝ๋ณ„ยท์˜์—ญ๋ณ„ IEG์— ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ์˜ํ–ฅ

  • SD๋Š” inferior blade์˜ cFos/Arc+ ์„ธํฌโ†“, hilus/CA3/CA1์—์„œ๋Š” IEGโ†‘. subregion๋ณ„ ์ƒ๋ฐ˜๋œ ๋„คํŠธ์›Œํฌ ๋ฐ˜์‘์„ ์ œ์‹œ.

Figures 4โ€“5 (p.8โ€“11): SD ์ „์‚ฌ์ฒด ๋ณ€ํ™”์˜ ๋‹ค์–‘์„ฑ

  • SD DEGs: DG superior(2097) vs inferior(1501), CA1(732), CA3(394) ๋“ฑ ๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ฒน์นจ์ด๋‚˜ ๋‹ค์ˆ˜๋Š” ๊ณ ์œ .
  • ๊ณตํ†ต KEGG: Circadian entrainment; blade-ํŠน์ด ํ•ญ๋ชฉ: superior์˜ glutamatergic synapse/mitochondrial ribosome ํŽธํ–ฅ, inferior์˜ endocannabinoid/oxytocin signaling ๋ฐ IEGs ์–ต์ œ. (๋„์‹ยท๋ฒค๋‹ค์ด์–ด๊ทธ๋žจ p.8โ€“9)

Figure 6 (p.11โ€“12): Blade ๊ฐ„ ์ฐจ์ด(์ˆ˜๋ฉด vs SD)์˜ ์žฌ๊ตฌ์„ฑ

  • Sleep๊ณผ SD์—์„œ inferior vs superior ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ๋’ค์ง‘ํžˆ๋Š” ์œ ์ „์ž(Homer1, Tesc ๋“ฑ).
  • SD ์กฐ๊ฑด์—์„œ๋งŒ regulation of actin cytoskeleton ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๊ฐ€ inferior bladeโ†“๋กœ ์ง‘์ค‘ ์–ต์ œ(Arp2/3, Pfn1/2, Pak1 ๋“ฑ). ์ด๋Š” spine remodeling ์†์ƒ ๊ฐ€์„ค์„ ์ง€์ง€.

Figure 7 (p.14โ€“15): ํ•™์Šต(CFC) ํšจ๊ณผ์˜ DG ์ œํ•œ์„ฑ

  • 6h ์‹œ์  CFC DEGs๋Š” DG์—๋งŒ ์กด์žฌ(superior 784 > inferior 32). Superior์—์„œ glutamate receptor/vesicle releaseโ†‘, GABA receptorโ†“ โ†’ E/I balance ์žฌ์„ค์ • ์‹œ์‚ฌ.

Figure 8 (p.16โ€“17): ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆยท์ธ์‚ฐํ™” ๋‹จ๋ฐฑ์งˆ์˜ ์˜์—ญ๋ณ„ ๋ณ€ํ™”

  • SD: CA1/CA3/hilus์˜ pS6/pERK1/2โ†‘; DG blades์—์„œ๋Š” Sleep/SD ์ฃผํšจ๊ณผ ์ œํ•œ์ . Blade ๊ฐ„ pS6 vs Rps6์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ „์‚ฌ-๋‹จ๋ฐฑ ๋ถˆ์ผ์น˜ ์‚ฌ๋ก€ ์ œ์‹œ(๋ฒˆ์—ญยท์ˆ˜์†ก ์ฐจ์ด ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ).

7. Discussion ์š”์•ฝ ๐Ÿ’ก

  • ํ•ต์‹ฌ ๋ฉ”์‹œ์ง€: ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์€ CFC ํ›„ DG inferior blade engram์˜ ์˜คํ”„๋ผ์ธ ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™”๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•ด CFM ๊ณต๊ณ ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ด‰์ง„ํ•œ๋‹ค. SD๋Š” ์ด ์žฌํ™œ์„ฑํ™” ์ฐฝ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ๋‹ซ๊ณ , ๋™์‹œ์ ์œผ๋กœ actin cytoskeletonยทribosomal biogenesis๋ฅผ ์–ต์ œํ•ด ๊ตฌ์กฐ์ /๋ฒˆ์—ญ ๊ธฐ๋ฐ˜ ๊ฐ€์†Œ์„ฑ์„ ๋ฐฉํ•ดํ•œ๋‹ค.
  • ํšŒ๋กœ ๊ด€์ : Superior vs. inferior blade๋Š” entorhinal input ๊ตฌ์„ฑยทinterneuron ๋ฐ€๋„๊ฐ€ ๋‹ฌ๋ผ SD ์‹œ inferior blade ์–ต์ œ์„ฑ ๊ฒŒ์ดํŒ…์ด ๊ฐ•ํ™”๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค(๊ฐ€์„ค). CA1/CA3์˜ IEGโ†‘๋Š” ๊ธฐ์–ต์— ์œ ์ตํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ณ  circuit SNR ์ €ํ•˜๋ฅผ ์•ผ๊ธฐํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค.
  • ์ œํ•œ์ : (i) 6h ๋‹จ์ผ ์‹œ์ , (ii) subregion ๋ฒŒํฌ ROI(์„ธํฌํ˜•/์†Œ๊ธฐ๊ด€ ๋ถ„ํ•ด๋Šฅ ๋ฏธ๋น„), (iii) engram-specific single-cell/axon-dendrite compartment ํ•ด์ƒ๋„ ๋ถ€์žฌ. ํ›„์† ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” cell type-resolved, compartment-resolved, engram-targeted ์ ‘๊ทผ ํ•„์š”.

This line appears after every note.

Notes mentioning this note